• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
CVE Vulnerability

CVE Vulnerability

  • CVE’s
  • Products
  • Vendors
Home » CVE’s

CVE’s


CVE
Vendors
Products
Updated
CVSS v2
CVSS v3
CVE-2022-45798
Apex One, Trendmicro
Antivirus_+_security_2019, Internet_security_2019, Maximum_security_2019, Premium_security_2019, Ransom_buster, Control_manager, Endpoint_sensor, Im_security, Mobile_security, Officescan
2023-01-13
N/A
7.8 HIGH
A link following vulnerability in the Damage Cleanup Engine component of Trend Micro Apex One and Trend Micro Apex One as a Service could allow a local attacker to escalate privileges by creating a symbolic link and abusing the service to delete a file. Please note: an attacker must first obtain the ability to execute low-privileged code on the target system in order to exploit this vulnerability.
CVE-2022-45797
Apex One, Trendmicro
Antivirus_+_security_2019, Internet_security_2019, Maximum_security_2019, Premium_security_2019, Ransom_buster, Control_manager, Endpoint_sensor, Im_security, Mobile_security, Officescan
2022-12-13
N/A
7.1 HIGH
An arbitrary file deletion vulnerability in the Damage Cleanup Engine component of Trend Micro Apex One and Trend Micro Apex One as a Service could allow a local attacker to escalate privileges and delete files on affected installations. Please note: an attacker must first obtain the ability to execute low-privileged code on the target system in order to exploit this vulnerability.
CVE-2022-45796
2023-02-15
N/A
7.2 HIGH
Command injection vulnerability in nw_interface.html in SHARP multifunction printers (MFPs)'s Digital Full-color Multifunctional System 202 or earlier, 120 or earlier, 600 or earlier, 121 or earlier, 500 or earlier, 402 or earlier, 790 or earlier, and Digital Multifunctional System (Monochrome) 200 or earlier, 211 or earlier, 102 or earlier, 453 or earlier, 400 or earlier, 202 or earlier, 602 or earlier, 500 or earlier, 401 or earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via unspecified vectors.
CVE-2022-4579
2022-12-20
N/A
N/A
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2022. Notes: none.
CVE-2022-45789
Modicon M580 Bmep586040c, Schneider-electric
Modicon_m221_firmware, Modicon_m221, Modicon_premium_firmware, Modicon_premium, Modicon_quantum_firmware, Modicon_quantum, Modicon_m340_firmware, Modicon_m340, Modicon_m580_firmware, Modicon_m580
2023-02-07
N/A
9.8 CRITICAL
A CWE-294: Authentication Bypass by Capture-replay vulnerability exists that could cause execution of unauthorized Modbus functions on the controller when hijacking an authenticated Modbus session. Affected Products: EcoStruxure™ Control Expert (All Versions), EcoStruxure™ Process Expert (Versions prior to V2020), Modicon M340 CPU - part numbers BMXP34* (All Versions), Modicon M580 CPU - part numbers BMEP* and BMEH* (All Versions), Modicon M580 CPU Safety - part numbers BMEP58*S and BMEH58*S (All Versions)
CVE-2022-45788
Modicon M580 Bmep586040c, Schneider-electric
Modicon_m221_firmware, Modicon_m221, Modicon_premium_firmware, Modicon_premium, Modicon_quantum_firmware, Modicon_quantum, Modicon_m340_firmware, Modicon_m340, Modicon_m580_firmware, Modicon_m580
2023-02-08
N/A
9.8 CRITICAL
A CWE-754: Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions vulnerability exists that could cause arbitrary code execution, denial of service and loss of confidentiality & integrity when a malicious project file is loaded onto the controller. Affected Products: EcoStruxure™ Control Expert (All Versions), EcoStruxure™ Process Expert (Versions prior to V2020), Modicon M340 CPU - part numbers BMXP34* (All Versions), Modicon M580 CPU - part numbers BMEP* and BMEH* (All Versions), Modicon M580 CPU Safety - part numbers BMEP58*S and BMEH58*S (All Versions), Modicon Momentum Unity M1E Processor - 171CBU* (All Versions), Modicon MC80 - BMKC80 (All Versions), Legacy Modicon Quantum - 140CPU65* and Premium CPUs - TSXP57* (All Versions)
CVE-2022-45787
2023-01-18
N/A
5.5 MEDIUM
Unproper laxist permissions on the temporary files used by MIME4J TempFileStorageProvider may lead to information disclosure to other local users. This issue affects Apache James MIME4J version 0.8.8 and prior versions. We recommend users to upgrade to MIME4j version 0.8.9 or later.
CVE-2022-45786
Age, Apache
Accumulo, Activemq, Activemq_apollo, Activemq_artemis, Age, Airavata_django_portal, Airflow, Airflow_mysql_provider, Alarm_instance_management, Allura
2023-02-16
N/A
8.1 HIGH
There are issues with the AGE drivers for Golang and Python that enable SQL injections to occur. This impacts AGE for PostgreSQL 11 & AGE for PostgreSQL 12, all versions up-to-and-including 1.1.0, when using those drivers. The fix is to update to the latest Golang and Python drivers in addition to the latest version of AGE that is used for PostgreSQL 11 or PostgreSQL 12. The update of AGE will add a new function to enable parameterization of the cypher() function, which, in conjunction with the driver updates, will resolve this issue. Background (for those who want more information): After thoroughly researching this issue, we found that due to the nature of the cypher() function, it was not easy to parameterize the values passed into it. This enabled SQL injections, if the developer of the driver wasn't careful. The developer of the Golang and Pyton drivers didn't fully utilize parameterization, likely because of this, thus enabling SQL injections. The obvious fix to this issue is to use parameterization in the drivers for all PG SQL queries. However, parameterizing all PG queries is complicated by the fact that the cypher() function call itself cannot be parameterized directly, as it isn't a real function. At least, not the parameters that would take the graph name and cypher query. The reason the cypher() function cannot have those values parameterized is because the function is a placeholder and never actually runs. The cypher() function node, created by PG in the query tree, is transformed and replaced with a query tree for the actual cypher query during the analyze phase. The problem is that parameters - that would be passed in and that the cypher() function transform needs to be resolved - are only resolved in the execution phase, which is much later. Since the transform of the cypher() function needs to know the graph name and cypher query prior to execution, they can't be passed as parameters. The fix that we are testing right now, and are proposing to use, is to create a function that will be called prior to the execution of the cypher() function transform. This new function will allow values to be passed as parameters for the graph name and cypher query. As this command will be executed prior to the cypher() function transform, its values will be resolved. These values can then be cached for the immediately following cypher() function transform to use. As added features, the cached values will store the calling session's pid, for validation. And, the cypher() function transform will clear this cached information after function invocation, regardless of whether it was used. This method will allow the parameterizing of the cypher() function indirectly and provide a way to lock out SQL injection attacks.
CVE-2022-45783
2023-02-14
N/A
6.5 MEDIUM
An issue was discovered in dotCMS core 4.x through 22.10.2. An authenticated directory traversal vulnerability in the dotCMS API can lead to Remote Code Execution.
CVE-2022-45782
2023-02-13
N/A
8.8 HIGH
An issue was discovered in dotCMS core 5.3.8.5 through 5.3.8.15 and 21.03 through 22.10.1. A cryptographically insecure random generation algorithm for password-reset token generation leads to account takeover.
« Previous 1 … 8,997 8,998 8,999 9,000 9,001 … 11,258 Next »

Copyright CVE Vulnerabilities 2023
Data Sources:

  • NIST
  • MITRE
  • CVE Search
  • Open CVE