• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
CVE Vulnerability

CVE Vulnerability

  • CVE’s
  • Products
  • Vendors
Home » CVE’s

CVE’s


CVE
Vendors
Products
Updated
CVSS v2
CVSS v3
CVE-2022-39183
2023-01-20
N/A
6.1 MEDIUM
Moodle Plugin - SAML Auth may allow Open Redirect through unspecified vectors.
CVE-2022-39182
2023-01-20
N/A
8.8 HIGH
H C Mingham-Smith Ltd - Tardis 2000 Privilege escalation.Version 1.6 is vulnerable to privilege escalation which may allow a malicious actor to gain system privileges.
CVE-2022-39181
2022-11-23
N/A
6.1 MEDIUM
GLPI - Reports plugin for GLPI Reflected Cross-Site-Scripting (RXSS). Type 1: Reflected XSS (or Non-Persistent) - The server reads data directly from the HTTP request and reflects it back in the HTTP response. Reflected XSS exploits occur when an attacker causes a victim to supply dangerous content to a vulnerable web application, which is then reflected back to the victim and executed by the web browser. The most common mechanism for delivering malicious content is to include it as a parameter in a URL that is posted publicly or emailed directly to the victim. URLs constructed in this manner constitute the core of many phishing schemes, whereby an attacker convinces a victim to visit a URL that refers to a vulnerable site. After the site reflects the attacker's content back to the victim, the content is executed by the victim's browser.
CVE-2022-39180
2022-11-18
N/A
9.8 CRITICAL
College Management System v1.0 - SQL Injection (SQLi). By inserting SQL commands to the username and password fields in the login.php page.
CVE-2022-3918
2023-02-02
N/A
8.8 HIGH
A program using FoundationNetworking in swift-corelibs-foundation is potentially vulnerable to CRLF ( ) injection in URLRequest headers. In this vulnerability, a client can insert one or several CRLF sequences into a URLRequest header value. When that request is sent via URLSession to an HTTP server, the server may interpret the content after the CRLF as extra headers, or even a second request. For example, consider a URLRequest to http://example.com/ with the GET method. Suppose we set the URLRequest header "Foo" to the value "Bar Extra-Header: Added GET /other HTTP/1.1". When this request is sent, it will appear to the server as two requests: GET / HTTP/1.1 Foo: Bar Extra-Header: Added GET /other HTTP/1.1 In this manner, the client is able to inject extra headers and craft an entirely new request to a separate path, despite only making one API call in URLSession. If a developer has total control over the request and its headers, this vulnerability may not pose a threat. However, this vulnerability escalates if un-sanitized user input is placed in header values. If so, a malicious user could inject new headers or requests to an intermediary or backend server. Developers should be especially careful to sanitize user input in this case, or upgrade their version of swift-corelibs-foundation to include the patch below.
CVE-2022-39179
2022-11-18
N/A
7.2 HIGH
College Management System v1.0 - Authenticated remote code execution. An admin user (the authentication can be bypassed using SQL Injection that mentioned in my other report) can upload .php file that contains malicious code via student.php file.
CVE-2022-39178
2022-11-22
N/A
5.3 MEDIUM
Webvendome - Webvendome Internal Server IP Disclosure. Send GET Request to the request which is shown in the picture. Internal Server IP and Full path disclosure.
CVE-2022-39177
2022-11-07
N/A
8.8 HIGH
BlueZ before 5.59 allows physically proximate attackers to cause a denial of service because malformed and invalid capabilities can be processed in profiles/audio/avdtp.c.
CVE-2022-39176
2022-11-07
N/A
8.8 HIGH
BlueZ before 5.59 allows physically proximate attackers to obtain sensitive information because profiles/audio/avrcp.c does not validate params_len.
CVE-2022-39173
2023-02-15
N/A
7.5 HIGH
In wolfSSL before 5.5.1, malicious clients can cause a buffer overflow during a TLS 1.3 handshake. This occurs when an attacker supposedly resumes a previous TLS session. During the resumption Client Hello a Hello Retry Request must be triggered. Both Client Hellos are required to contain a list of duplicate cipher suites to trigger the buffer overflow. In total, two Client Hellos have to be sent: one in the resumed session, and a second one as a response to a Hello Retry Request message.
« Previous 1 … 9,404 9,405 9,406 9,407 9,408 … 11,258 Next »

Copyright CVE Vulnerabilities 2023
Data Sources:

  • NIST
  • MITRE
  • CVE Search
  • Open CVE